Every new tool your team wants to install is a compliance decision. We vet third-party software against CMMC Level 2 and NIST SP 800-171 — OSINT screening plus sandboxed dynamic analysis — and hand you an audit-ready report, fixed price, starting at $399.
DIB contractors are stuck between generic tools that don't examine the software itself and consultants built for multi-month engagements, not a same-week answer.
A thorough OSINT + dynamic-analysis review takes 15+ hours of a Senior SecOps Engineer's time per application — time pulled straight from your own infrastructure work.
Tools like Vanta or SecurityScorecard score the vendor company as a whole. They don't detonate the actual installer in a sandbox or tell you whether this specific binary is safe to allowlist.
ThreatLocker and similar tools enforce a deny-by-default policy well, but someone still has to decide whether a given application is safe to allow — that decision is what we deliver.
Full-service consultancies are built for multi-month System Security Plan engagements, not a same-week answer to "can we install this one tool?"
Dates for mandatory C3PAO assessments have been in flux, so check the Department of Defense and Cyber AB for the current schedule. These requirements apply regardless.
Contractors in applicable solicitations post Level 1 or Level 2 self-assessment results to SPRS before award, and an affirming official confirms continued compliance every year.
DFARS 252.204-7012 already requires implementing NIST SP 800-171 on systems that handle CUI, whatever the schedule for third-party assessments.
Applications you allow into the CUI environment are part of what that score and affirmation describe. An undocumented approval is a weak spot in either one.
Keep a documented decision for every application you allow: what an approved software list should record. General information, not legal advice.
Sanctions/FOCI screening, vulnerability-disclosure and CVE-history review, accreditation and infrastructure hygiene checks. A fast, low-cost filter — if the vendor fails here, we stop before you pay for sandbox time.
The installer is detonated in an isolated sandbox: network telemetry, filesystem and registry changes, execution privileges, and trust-chain validation, ending in a hardening blueprint and NIST 800-171 control mapping.
$399
A fast Go/No-Go filter for a single application, before you commit engineering time or budget.
$1,299
Everything in Tier 1, plus sandboxed dynamic analysis and an audit-ready report mapped to NIST 800-171.
From $2,499
Urgent turnarounds, kernel-mode drivers, ERP-scale platforms, or gated/NDA-only software.
| Criteria | SaaS TPRM Platforms | MSSPs & Consultants | DigVel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vets the specific binary, not just the vendor | No | partial | Yes |
| Turnaround time | Instant, but shallow | 1–3 weeks | Fast, fixed-scope turnaround |
| Pricing | Contact Sales, $40K+ | Time & Material | Fixed, from $399 |
| Deliverable | Dashboard / risk score | General SSP / POA&M | Audit-ready PDF mapped to NIST 800-171 |
See exactly which NIST SP 800-171r2 / CMMC Level 2 controls — including CM.L2-3.4.8 allowlisting — our reports satisfy.
View the mappingWalk through what an audit-ready DigVel report actually contains, from Go/No-Go decision to hardening blueprint.
View report structureHow to build an approved software list CMMC assessors can follow: required fields, version policy, evidence per entry and how the list ties to your system security plan.
3 min readRead Controls & RequirementsWhat CM.L2-3.4.8 requires, how NIST SP 800-171A turns it into assessment objectives, and what evidence to keep for every application on your allowlist.
5 min readRead Controls & RequirementsWhat CM.L2-3.4.9 asks defense contractors to do about software that users install themselves, and how to control and monitor it without blocking legitimate work.
3 min readReadSend us the software, its version, and target OS. We'll take it from there.